CCA’s Role In The Management Of Red Snapper
The Coastal Conservation Association has long represented the interests
of inshore and offshore recreational anglers. In more than twenty years
of participation in the management of our state and federal fisheries,
we have never lost our focus on the tenet of good stewardship of our
marine resources. Balancing the interests of recreational anglers and
the sacrifices needed for the longevity of the resource is not always
easy. Clearly there are times when the two goals oppose each other. But,
in being good stewards, we must not become myopic in our goals for
management. Through a directed focus on the future health and longevity
of our fisheries and the role of recreational fishermen in them, CCA
will continue to pioneer a visionary approach to the conservation of our
marine resources.
The management of the Gulf red snapper fishery has tested all limits of
patience and sensibility. With input from recreational fishermen, the
for-hire industry, commercial fishermen, environmental groups, and
countless other special interests, no conclusion brings accord. There is
dissention among user groups and, sadly, within user groups. But,
through a careful examination of CCA’s historic participation in the
management of this fishery, it is evident that the needs of the
recreational angler are being well represented.
The problems in this complex fishery are not recent developments. From
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council’s red snapper assessments
in the late 1970s to the current battles over total allowable catch (TAC)
and bycatch reduction devices (BRDs), CCA continues to strive for a
long-term solution that combines proper utilization of the resource with
long-term stock stability. Without a healthy resource, no user group is
happy.
With shorter seasons and reduced bag limits, TAC has become the
catchword for red snapper in the new millennium. CCA has always
supported the largest TAC and, subsequently, the longest season possible
within the tight framework necessary for the proper recovery of the
fishery. Without following the management methods necessary for
rebuilding the fishery, there will be no recovery. In that scenario, we
would face even more draconian regulations and the specter of
moratoriums and closures. This would be unacceptable.
The true task at hand is to ensure a place for the recreational user
group in this recovering fishery. We cannot have myopic solutions with
short-term increases in the TAC or season if they lead to long-term
problem in the total health of the fishery. This would only lead to
further and more stringent regulation and an eventual dissipation in
user group interest.
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is mandated by law to manage
this fishery. The Magnuson -Stevens Act dictates rigorous parameters for
the recovery of a fishery that has been deemed overfished. The state of
the red snapper fishery has been a subject of countless debates. But,
with the existing peer reviewed data that NMFS is using, we have the
largest possible TAC and season allowed within the boundaries of the
existing management plan. This does not implicitly make the management
system right or easy, but it does qualify as the best possible plan we
currently have in place. To enact a fundamental change, we will have to
continue the unending pursuit of enhanced data and explore alternative
management plans with a more obtainable biomass.
CCA has attracted a lot of attention by supporting NMFS’ current
management plan. In trying to provide a stable set of red snapper
regulations, CCA, through its general counsel Bob Hayes, intervened in a
lawsuit in support of the current TAC and season.
“We would gladly support a twelve month season and larger TAC if the
fishery could accommodate it without jeopardizing the recovery of the
biomass,” said Will Ohmstede, Chairman of CCA Texas’ government affairs
committee. “To think that CCA arbitrarily supports a shorter season and
less recreational access is laughable.” But, at the current 9.12 million
pound TAC, a twelve-month season would result in a reduced bag limit and
increased size limit. As we saw last summer, this plan would do no good
for any participant in the fishery or the red snapper stock.
We are very sympathetic to the south Texas charter industry’s desire for
an early seasonal opening. But, an early season opener will only result
in a more rapid closure. Due to the weather constraints of late winter
and early spring, the amount of recreational access would likely be
reduced and fewer fishermen would be able to utilize this public marine
resource. This would clearly serve no one.
“If the science would show that the fishery can sustain a twelve or
fifteen million pound TAC and still recover, then a twelve month season
with a decent bag and size would be a reality,” said Pat Murray,
Communications Director for CCA. “But, as it stands, there is not a
single peer reviewed study that supports an increase of that magnitude.”
It is CCA’s tenacious support of BRDs in the Gulf shrimp trawling
industry that has allowed the TAC to not sink to 6 million pounds.
Through work with the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council and
seemingly unending legal battles with the Texas Shrimp Association, CCA
has managed to maintain BRDs for the protection of juvenile Gulf red
snapper. Without BRDs, an estimated 60 to 80 percent of the juvenile red
snapper population is in jeopardy. We must remember that growing
involvement by environmental interests in fisheries management will
increase the push for reductions in the TAC.
“The battle for access to this fishery by recreational fishermen will be
to maintain the existing TAC,” said Hayes. “By continuing to improve
data and maintain BRDs, we can work for an improved future for the
management of our red snapper stock.”
No one has won in the management of the red snapper fishery. The
questions still outnumber the solutions. “Clearly, no single lawsuit,
press release, or march on the capitol will solve the red snapper
problem,” said Murray. “But, somewhere between a moratorium and
unlimited access dwells the middle ground that will allow for recovery
of this fishery.” By working on all levels of management (local, state,
and national), CCA continues to balance the fight for access for
recreational fishermen and the goal of longevity for this prized
species.