|

The eNewsletter for
members of Coastal Conservation Association |
sponsored by

August 2007
The Monster is Breathing…
THINGS ARE DEVELOPING FAST in the
Pacific Northwest.
Just seven months ago, a group of
concerned anglers approached CCA about expanding to address numerous
conservation issues in the
region, not the least of which are profound problems within the salmon
fishery. In March, the CCA National Board of Directors approved plans
for the expansion and in late May, the CCA Washington and CCA Oregon
chapters held their first meetings to elect officers, and appoint
committee chairmen and local chapter leaders.
Oh, and in the meantime more than 1,500
people in the region signed up to become members of CCA.
Folks in the northwest corner of the
country inhabit a truly special place. It is obvious they appreciate
their spectacular outdoor playground and they are passionate about the
historic runs of salmon and steelhead that have defined the region for
hundreds or even thousands of years. Every stream and creek has
significance to local anglers. Even mere slivers of water that you
could cross without getting your feet wet are hallowed places.
The founders and leaders of CCA
Washington and CCA Oregon harbor no illusions about the challenges
facing their fisheries. It is going to be a tough, long road. Salmon
may be among the most complicated fish to manage in the entire world,
combining all the fun of inland, coastal and offshore issues with the
joys of local, state, tribal, national and international
jurisdictions. Not to mention the special challenges posed by
rapacious (and protected) predators like California sea lions and
Caspian terns.
It would be easy to despair and allow
natural runs of fish to slowly fade into history, but there is a
resolve in the region to not let that happen. Those fish mean too much
to too many people. There is a palpable desire to find a way that will
work and produce results.
The leadership of CCA Oregon and CCA
Washington know it will take a strong grassroots network, a coherent
advocacy plan, and dedicated leaders to find the new way and implement
it. While there are great challenges ahead, there is also a quiet
confidence that they will succeed, simply because they have to. This
plight is unfortunately familiar to many saltwater anglers.
Sitting in a crowded Legion Hall in
Washington and the packed conference room of an Oregon Holiday Inn
last month, I was reminded of 14 recreational anglers who gathered in
Houston, Texas 30 years ago to address gross commercial overfishing of
redfish and speckled trout. As the saying goes, individual commitment
to a group effort – that is what makes a team work, a company work, a
society work, a civilization work. That is what founded CCA and it is
what makes it work today.
As CCA in the Pacific Northwest rumbles
to life, I remember a story about a gentleman named Danny Middlebrooks,
a CCA Texas member who, among others, helped make the CCA San Antonio
banquet the powerhouse it is today – a massive fundraiser that
grosses more than three-quarters of a million dollars in a single
night. Danny and the other banquet committee leaders never lost focus
of the potential of the banquet and had the vision to see what it
could do. On the night of the event, after months and months of
preparation and while watching the first few of the nearly 1,500
people trickle in, Middlebrooks surveyed the scene and solemnly
announced to his fellow Board members, “The monster is breathing.”
Witnessing the determination and
commitment displayed in those meeting rooms in Washington and Oregon,
I experienced exactly what Danny Middlebrooks, and all of his
dedicated banquet committee members must have felt on that stage.
The monster is now breathing in the
Pacific Northwest.
To get involved with CCA in the Pacific
Northwest, contact CCAPNW@JoinCCA.org. |
CCA Kicks Off Next Phase in Red Snapper Recovery
CCA-funded study will examine
effectiveness of recreational
catch-and-release practices
LESS THAN A MONTH AFTER WINNING a
precedent-setting victory to reduce the impact of shrimp trawl bycatch
on Gulf red snapper stocks, Coastal Conservation Association has
funded the next step in its ongoing strategy for the conservation of
the fishery. CCA Texas approved a request to fund a study at the
University of Texas Marine Science Institute to assess the
catch-and-release mortality of recreationally caught red snapper and
to develop best practices for handling and proper release.
“The only way to address a complicated
fishery issue like red snapper is with a methodical, systematic
approach,” said Mark Ray, chairman of CCA Texas. “We believe our
lawsuit and the Gulf Council’s subsequent decision earlier this month
to reduce shrimp trawl bycatch by 74 percent from 2001-2003 levels
laid the foundation for red snapper recovery. Now we are prepared to
move on to other factors, including reducing recreational bycatch.”
At its meeting earlier this week,
CCA Texas’ board of directors approved the request to fund a $37,000
catch-and-release study to be conducted by Dr. Scott Holt and Dr. Joan
Holt of the University of Texas Marine Science Institute in Port
Aransas, Texas. The study will involve catching undersized red snapper
from depths of 50 to 300 feet at different times of year. Researchers
will retain a number of fish in various stages of health for
observation; experiments will be developed to evaluate the influence
of season, depth, initial condition after capture and venting on the
overall survival of released red snapper.
“There is a lot of contention out there
among anglers about how effective catch-and-release is for
deep-dwelling fish, and there are a lot of different opinions floating
around. We feel we need to put our money where our mouth is and get
the science that will help us make the best decisions for this
fishery,” said Robby Byers, executive director of CCA Texas. “There is
no question recreational anglers have a role to play in the future of
red snapper,
and we want to make sure we have the best information available to do
our part.”
Numerous studies have been conducted on
the release mortality of red snapper since 2000, producing a wide
range of estimates. The UTMSI study is designed to fill in some of the
gaps in the current body of science and bring a new look to this
important factor in the management of Gulf red snapper.
“It is going to take a holistic approach
and a long-term commitment to find solutions to all the challenges
facing red snapper,” said Pat Murray, CCA director of conservation.
“No single thing is going to fix this fishery, but we are steadily
putting the pieces together. From improving catch-and-release
practices to enhancing habitat, CCA is committed to the recovery of
this important species.”

Red Snapper Q&A
What year does the June 1st to September 15th season go into
effect?
If
the new rules are approved, as we assume they will be, 2008. The
interim rule expires 9/29. NMFS tells us that they will extend that
rule's bag limit provisions maintaining the 10/31 end of season for
2007. However, they will be looking at recreational catch data
through the summer and may
alter this if it seems necessary. Stay tuned.
How is the shrimp trawl bycatch mortality rate calculated?
Data from shrimp
trawlers (observers) and NMFS experimental trawling each year is
collected to calculate average red snapper percentage in observed
trawls. This is multiplied by total shrimp trawl effort to estimate
total red snapper take for that year. The mortality (i.e. what
portion of the total red snapper of those vulnerable ages was taken
that year) is an output of the assessment model. This is done by
measuring the number of fish by age (especially ages 1, 2, 3) taken in
the directed fishery and correlating it with the estimates of numbers
removed in previous years by trawls.
Are the shrimpers ever going to be kept out of waters that red snapper
spawn in June through August?
The new
regulations will require a 74% reduction of trawl effort in the
central and western Gulf in the 60 - 180 foot depth zone that accounts
for 90% of the red snapper juvenile bycatch. If effort in one year
exceeds the cap, shrimping in the following year will be closed for as
many days as it takes to make up the overage. This will both reduce
effort during the spawning season and offer closures in that time
period if effort reduction caps are exceeded.
A reduction of effort in those areas of high juvenile
(first 1.6 years of life) bycatch is more important than closures
during spawning season because 1) most spawning occurs in and around
reef, rock and rig substrate where shrimping doesn't occur and 2)
there is an approximate 40 day larval period where the floating
post-hatchlings are distributed over often broad geographic areas by
currents. After this period the larvae transform into what looks like
a little 1-inch snapper and they settle and accumulate on the coarse
sand substrates mostly in the 60- to 180-foot range where we now hope
to protect them from trawls.
-- Dr. Russell Nelson
CCA Gulf Fisheries Consultant |
|
CCA and Valero Partner in Conservation
North America’s
largest refiner
offers three-year commitment to
youth angler outreach and
education program
Coastal Conservation
Association and Valero Energy Corporation have teamed up to promote
conservation ethics in young anglers. Through a dynamic youth program
that will include an eye-catching newsletter, interactive web site, and
conservation-oriented school lesson plans, Valero and CCA will work to
capture the enthusiasm of children and encourage them to understand and
protect the coastal landscape.
Valero has pledged a three-year commitment
to sponsor CCA’s Rising Tide youth program.
“Valero’s generous support will allow CCA
to devote more resources to our youth program than ever before, and that
clearly bodes well for the future of our marine resources,” said Pat
Murray, CCA vice president and director of conservation. “Through this
partnership with Valero, we will be seeking to engage the imagination
and hope of young people to create a powerful force for marine
conservation.”
Valero is the largest refiner in North
America and has traditionally focused its charitable giving on projects
involving education and youth. It is only the second company ever to
twice receive the United Way’s highest honor, the Spirit of America
Award. Its employees donated a record-breaking 272,000 hours of time
last year to volunteer for countless community projects, including
mentoring students, organizing fundraisers, participating in clean-up
events, volunteering at youth centers and much more.
“With Valero’s long history of community
involvement, support of children and strong presence in coastal areas,
it’s a nice tie,” Valero President Greg King said. “More than 40,000 CCA
members live in the areas where we have a refinery. Valero is proud to
help protect our coastal regions and take an active role in teaching
youth about conservation and coastal responsibility.”
CCA is a nonprofit organization dedicated
to the conservation of coastal marine resources. In operation for more
than 30 years, CCA has 17 state chapters and more than 10,000 youth
members among its more than 100,000 total membership. CCA is known as
the national leader in marine conservation.
“Together, CCA and Valero are creating
the conservationists of tomorrow through education, support and
guidance,” Murray said. “But our youth members are not only the future;
they are capable of doing amazing things today. Valero’s support will
enable us to tap into that potential now and in the future.”
 |
Click the Ad to Visit the CCA Store:
CCA South Carolina Wins
Comprehensive Finfish Plan
Based upon the concept of
a “proactive approach” initially put forth by Coastal Conservation
Association South Carolina (CCA SC) in January 2006, the South Carolina
General Assembly passed S. 489 on June 6, 2007 which represents the most
comprehensive conservation legislation regarding recreational saltwater
finfish over the past three decades.
“We have reached a
critical point in managing our marine resources and this legislation
promotes a proactive change in the management of our state marine
fisheries” said Mike Able, CCA SC Government Relations committee
chairman. “As more and more people
move to the Palmetto State and realize the availability of these fish
and the incredible angling experience they provide, we expect to see a
growing interest in the responsible stewardship of the resources.”
The CCA Comprehensive
Finfish initiative, as S. 489 was often referred to, calls for the
adjustment or creation of recreational size and creel limits for five
finfish species and the complete protection of two additional species.
The species include red drum, black drum, spotted seatrout, flounder,
and weakfish (summer trout), which are among the most important and
popular recreational species in South Carolina. A moratorium on the
harvest of two species of saltwater catfish was also included at the
request of the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR).
CCA SC’s concerns over the health of the population of these species
were confirmed last summer through a series of public meetings conducted
in seven different areas around the state by the SCDNR Marine Resources
Division, and were attended by a broad representation of recreational
saltwater anglers.
“We applaud the commitment
of the South Carolina General Assembly in their efforts to protect with
reasonable measures South Carolina’s coastal fisheries,” said Charles
Farmer, CCA SC Legislative Council. The legislation required strong
support from many members of the Assembly especially Sen. Chip Campsen
of Charleston, the original sponsor of the bill, Sen. Greg Gregory of
Lancaster, Chairman of the Senate Fish, Game, & Forestry Committee, Sen.
Yancey McGill of Kingstree, Rep. Billy Witherspoon of Conway, Chairman
of the House Agriculture, Natural Resources & Environmental Affairs
Committee, Rep. Mike Pitts of Laurens, Rep. Jackie Hayes of Dillon, and
Rep. Chip Limehouse of Charleston.
“CCA took great efforts in
maintaining an open line of communication with the SCDNR Board of
Directors and Marine Advisory Committee (MAC) throughout the entire
legislative process” said CCA SC State Chairman, Tombo Milliken. “This
legislation is the product of a lot of time and effort on the part of
CCA and recreational fishermen, SCDNR, marine fisheries managers, and
legislative decision makers. Equally important, it represents a unified
approach by all involved to enact reasonable, proactive measures
necessary to protect the abundance of our marine resources before
problems related to overfishing and habitat loss actually occur.” |

|
Click Below to Apply for Your CCA Credit Card:

Coastal Conservation Association
30 Years of Conservation
Did You Know?
n
CCA was founded and incorporated 30 years ago.
n
CCA is one of the nation’s largest marine
conservation association with more than 90,000 members through 17 state
chapters.
n
CCA is recognized by fisheries managers as
instrumental in the recovery of redfish, striped bass, king mackerel,
Spanish mackerel, speckled trout, grouper and swordfish.
n
CCA recently pledged $700,000 for the
construction of a state-of-the-art marine science lab with the University
of Texas Marine Science Institute.
n
CCA has funded more than $1,000,000 in
habitat projects, marine science research efforts and critically important
law enforcement equipment throughout Gulf and Atlantic states.
n
CCA has helped establish gamefish status
for billfish and redfish, net bans in four states and the prohibition of
many destructive commercial gear types.
n
CCA has a registered lobbyist in
Washington D.C. and has been active in federal fisheries issues since
1984.
n
CCA has a full-time, expert consultant for
all Atlantic and Gulf fisheries management issues who provides
representation for CCA at every meeting of the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission, the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council and
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council.
n
CCA has a legal defense fund that has been
used to defend net bans and bycatch reduction devices, support
pro-fisheries legislation and enforce existing fisheries regulations.
n
CCA created funding for
two of the largest saltwater hatchery and research centers in the world.
|
The Price of
Mismanagement
The bill for
decades of overharvest
has come due in the form of an
overfished summer flounder stock
The most recent summer flounder stock
assessment brought some unwelcome news to East Coast anglers last week
and will almost certainly result in additional catch reductions for
recreational fishermen. The assessment, conducted by National Marine
Fisheries Service, indicated that years of mismanagement have finally
caught up to summer flounder, and steps will have to be taken to set the
recovery back on course.
In technical terms, the assessment
revealed that overfishing is currently occurring in the summer flounder
fishery, and also determined that the stock is overfished. "Overfishing"
on a stock occurs when too many fish are harvested to meet management
goals. An "overfished" designation means the spawning stock has been
depleted below a safe level and not enough spawning-age fish remain for
the population to sustain itself unless harvest is reduced.
In this case, overfishing has finally
forced the stock into an overfished condition, and fisheries managers
are now required by law to reverse both.
The problems faced now by summer flounder
are a predictable result of managers' failure to take a
conservation-minded approach to the fishery over the long term. Managers
have instead opted to set catch regulations at the very highest limits
allowed under federal rebuilding guidelines. While that philosophy
translated into longer seasons and more liberal regulations for anglers
in the past, those same regulations also were the least likely to
achieve the ultimate goal: rebuilding the stock to healthy levels.
The bill for the risky approach to summer
flounder management is unfortunately coming due now.
The recovery of summer flounder has been
complicated by many factors, not the least of which is its enormous
popularity and ready accessibility coastwide. Businesses dependent on
fish and fishing rely on summer flounder to help fill ice chests for
their customers.
"There is a lot of concern right now over
summer flounder, and rightfully so," said Richen Brame, CCA Atlantic
States Fisheries Director. "Anglers today are being asked to help
correct the mistakes of the past 25 years and we hope this is a lesson
to managers to take their role as stewards of the resource seriously.
You cannot manage these fisheries on the edge of a cliff and hope
everything works out. The history of this fishery is littered with
missed conservation opportunities, and now we all have to pay the bill."
###
Summer Flounder Fact:
Overfishing has never been brought under
control since the initiation of the management plan in 1983. Overfishing,
which means taking too many fish from the stock for the spawning stock
to replenish itself, has occurred every year since 1983. The sooner that
overfishing is brought under control, the sooner we will see a recovery
in this fishery.
|

|
The World of Recreational
Angling Is Changing
By Richen Brame
CCA Atlantic States and South Atlantic Fisheries Director
Brame is also a member of the Operations Team for
the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) developing the nuts and
bolts of the new data gathering program. He is also the liaison between
the Operations Team and the Registry Team that is defining what the angler
registry must encompass and what the states must do to comply with it.
|
|
There is an historic meeting taking place in Florida - scientists,
managers and anglers from across the country are are attending a workshop
to begin fixing the well-known problems with marine recreational fishing
data collection. Anglers will be managed by the data collected through
this new program for the foreseeable future, so we have a vital stake in
making it the more effective, efficient system we can. While we do not
know what the ultimate program will be, there are a few simple concepts
that will help us all understand why we sample recreational catch and how
catch estimates are done.
Why do we sample
recreational data and not count every fish?
For the vast majority of fisheries, it would be
impossible to count every fish landed by recreational fishermen. There are
simply too many fishermen fishing from too many areas and making too many
trips to make such a tally possible. This is a very important difference
between recreational and commercial fisheries, where a relatively small
number of persons land all of the fish (with the exception of illegal
landings) making an actual count practical.
Since actually counting recreationally-caught fish is
not a practical option, we must sample a small portion of the recreational
catch and, on the basis of such sampling, estimate the number of fish
landed.
Collecting recreational fishery data is similar to a
political poll, where a small number of folks are contacted to estimate
how they would vote, and the total vote calculated from that estimate. The
commercial fishery, on the other hand, is “elected,” in that the votes
(i.e., fish) are actually counted.
How does a sampling
program work?
The current MRFSS system incorporates a simple
estimation procedure and serves as a good example of a sampling scheme. It
is comprised of two parts:
1. Intercepts, in which anglers are
“intercepted” (interviewed) after completing a fishing trip, and their
catch was verified and measured. From that information, gathered over time
and in various locales, the average catch per trip (catch/trip) was
estimated; and
2. Telephone survey, in which households in coastal counties are
contacted by phone and, when a saltwater angler is found, they are asked
the number of trips they took in the preceding two months. From this
information the number of trips is estimated.
From those two independent surveys, the total
recreational catch is estimated through the use of the formula: Catch *
Trips = Catch Per Trip
The new system, although different and better able to
eliminate known gaps in the data, will still be a survey.
Why not just ask
fishermen that are interviewed how many times they went fishing instead of
calling them at a later date?
If the anglers intercepted at the dock, beach or
pier were asked how often they fished, then all the data used in the
survey would come from one source – the angler intercept. In statistical
terms the data would be “incestuous,” meaning you were using the same data
in several different ways to estimate the catch. The current system uses
two independent data sets that helps reduce any bias in the data
collected. If the data were obtained from one intercept and had some
“error” in it (ie some segment of the angler catch was not sampled), the
resulting catch estimate would be more far more suspect.
Will the catch
estimate be accurate?
That is the $64 million question, as it is with all
surveys. First let’s define a couple of terms that are often confused:
1. Precision - Precision is best explained with
an analogy to target shooting – if you shoot 5 bullets at a bullseye and
they hit the target within an inch of each other, that is precision
shooting.
2. Accuracy – However, if the bullet grouping
is 5 inches to the right of the bullseye and 6 inches low, it is not very
accurate.
When sampling fishermen, we can determine the precision
of our estimates statistically. Precision is really a measure of how well
a survey was conducted – a survey with precise results can most likely be
repeated with similar results. A survey with very low precision will most
likely yield different results if repeated. Accuracy, however, is much
more difficult to determine when sampling a large population like
recreational fishermen.
If the population of all anglers in all locations at
all times is randomly sampled, a precise estimate of catch will most
likely be accurate, similar to a good political poll. However, if a
portion of the angler population is not sampled, then a precise estimate
of catch will be less accurate.
Accuracy is especially important if managers are going
to directly compare the recreational harvest with the commercial harvest
via a Total Allowable Catch (TAC) or an allocation. As mentioned earlier,
the commercial harvest is assumed to be as complete and accurate as
possible. If we were managing just a recreational fishery, then a survey
conducted with precision would be more than adequate - the resulting
estimates would comparable to each other over time or area. It's comparing
an accurate commercial harvest with an estimated recreational harvest that
has caused problems in the past. hat's really one of the main reason we
are going through all this trouble to improve recreational data collection
- in addition to the basic fact that better data means better decision,
managers are now required by law to set Annual Catch Limits.
This leads to our
next topic:
What is error?
When estimating recreational catch, error does not
necessarily mean that anyone did anything wrong, it simply denotes the
confidence one has in whatever number is being estimated – if there is
little error one is confident of the number, if there is a lot of error,
one is much less confident of the number.
A good way to understand error is to explain it in
reverse – if for some reason you could wave a magic wand and count every
fish landed by recreational fishermen, the resulting catch number would
not have any error – you counted them
all and have a rock solid number. Theoretically, once you miss
a
few fish somewhere, then there is some error in your catch estimate.
Statisticians usually express error as a “Percent
Standard Error” or a number “plus or minus” some percentage. The way
they do this is not important for this discussion – the take home message
is that with all surveys there will be error associated with the catch
estimate. This does not mean the estimate is wrong. The lower
the error, however it is expressed, the more precise the estimate is, the
larger the
error, the less precise it is.
In the future, the recreational catch will be figured
using a survey that contacts relatively few fishermen and estimates the
catch. Hopefully the biases in the current survey will be eliminated and
the resulting estimates more precise and more accurate. Your
understanding of this and your input into the process that will change the
data collection system will be critical to the success of this new
program. One thing is certain (ie without error): recreational
fishermen will be dependent on the new Marine
Recreational Information Program to provide timely, accurate estimates of
their catch that will be employed for management purposes.
|
|
CCA Florida Issues Position on Everglades National Park Management Plan
In May, the
National Park Service (NPS) released four preliminary alternatives for
the development of the Everglades National Park (ENP) General Management
Plan. The alternatives range from maintaining current management
measures to draconian restrictions on boating access.
“No individual or
organization holds the Everglades National Park and its unique
environment in higher regard than CCA and its members,” said Michael
Kennedy, Chairman of a special CCA Florida subcommittee. “CCA Florida is
more than willing to support and seek funding for angler education,
restoration efforts, and to properly mark access channels in areas where
the Park has evidence of recent sea grass damage. However, we will
oppose the huge zones which prohibit or exclude traditional access by
motorized recreational fishing boats.”
One alternative would prohibit the use of internal
combustion engines in all waters less than three feet deep. In Florida
Bay alone, that alternative would prohibit traditional boating in more
than 150 square miles!
The NPS proposals
for such severe restrictions in one of the world’s premier saltwater
fishing destinations set off a firestorm of public opposition. Hundreds
of anglers showed up at each of the public workshops held by the NPS to
oppose the unnecessary restrictions. In addition, some state officials
have commented in opposition to the plans.
CCA Florida set
up a special subcommittee of its Government Relations Committee to
review and develop recommendations on the general management plan
alternatives as they go through the process. The subcommittee contains
representation from local chapters around the Park and from individuals
across the state with detailed knowledge of fishing within the Park.
Some have fished the area for more than forty years. Michael Kennedy,
former state board chairman, is chairman of the subcommittee.
The
subcommittee’s recommendations were presented and approved by the CCA
Executive Board on July 14. The recommendations include the following:
1. ALTERNATIVE A IS ACCEPTABLE WITH
MODIFICATION
-
Alternative A should be revised to
reflect all restrictions presently in place, including existing No
Wake Zones in the Flamingo, Everglades City and Key Largo areas, the
no motor zones in designated canoe trails and no landing areas in
Florida Bay.
-
The Park should engage an active program
to educate all users in proper vessel operation, courteous operation
and respect for the Park’s resources.
-
The NPS should provide signage for
channels and transit areas around the grass flats in the more commonly
used areas.
2. ALTERNATIVES B, C, AND D ARE
UNACCEPTABLE
-
CCA does not support any large area
“Management by Water Depth,” “Backcountry,” “Research,” “Management by
Vessel Length” or other such zones which exclude normal or traditional
access by motorized recreational fishing boats. We have requested the
NPS to provide documentation such as boat strandings data, aerial
photos of grass bed damage or other such evidence which may indicate a
need for additional protection measures. The seagrass information
should be over a specific time period and in the context of total
seagrasses within the park. CCA will participate with the NPS, when
such information is provided, to help establish effective channel
marking, public education and enforcement measures to solve any
resource problems.
There is already
indication that the Park is rethinking their proposed management
alternatives. Park Superintendent Dan Kimball attended the CCA Florida
Convention last weekend and provided comments on the management plan.
Kimball stated that based on public comments, meetings with interest
groups, and “ground truthing” trips into the Park “the NPS is in the
process of significantly modifying these alternatives, particularly in
regard to how these alternatives address boating management in the
park.”
The NPS plans to
release a revised set of preliminary alternatives for public comment
this fall and additional public hearings will be held.
“This is an
extremely important, high priority issue for CCA Florida,” said Ted
Forsgren, CCA Florida Executive Director. “We will continue to be a
major participant in every aspect of the ENP management plan process.”
Periodic updates on the Everglades National Park issue can be found on
CCA Florida’s website at
www.ccaflorida.org. |

Ribbon-Cutting Set for
$700,000 CCA Texas
Marine Larviculture Lab
Representatives of Coastal Conservation Association (CCA) and the University
of Texas Marine Science Institute (UTMSI) will meet in Port Aransas, Texas,
on August --, to officially open what will be one of the foremost marine
larviculture laboratories in the world. The $700,000 CCA Texas Laboratory
for Marine Larviculture Lab will focus on the production of such
recreationally important species as flounder, cobia, snapper and snook and
produce cutting-edge research on increasing the success of existing
hatcheries.
CCA
Texas and UTMSI officials worked for more than a year to iron out the
details and in the end, CCA Texas completely funded $700,000 for the design,
construction and most of the equipment for the creation of a
state-of-the-art lab of almost 3,000 square feet.
“It was
kind of like building your dream house, said Bill Schwarzlose, CCA Texas
president. “The longer we worked on it, the bigger the project got. In the
end, we funded a lab that will provide vital marine science long after we
are all gone.”
Amenities at the lab
include office space for graduate students, a
lab, and facilities to experiment with growing out the food to feed newly
hatched organisms. The lab has enough space for six 10,000-pound water
tanks, each equipped with its own heating, chilling and filtration system.
Each of those tanks are large enough to hold six separate bins, each one
addressing a different variable in environmental conditions, such as water
clarity, temperature and salinity, with much greater control than ever
before.
According to Dr. Lee Fuiman, Director of UTMSI,
“The key to success for natural populations of fishes often lies in the
survival of their larvae. Even in hatcheries and mariculture facilities,
survival of these early life stages is usually the critical step. A new
state-of-the-art laboratory for researching the requirements of larval
fishes is crucial to advancing our understanding and developing new
technologies that will improve the health of fish populations in Texas and
beyond. The wisdom and generosity of CCA Texas has made that facility
possible.”
CCA Texas Commits $200,000 For
Shrimp License Buyback Program
In an effort to
reduce the harmful impact of shrimp trawls in Texas coastal waters,
Coastal Conservation Association Texas (CCA Texas) has made a $200,000
commitment to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department bay and bait
shrimp license buyback program.
“Reducing shrimp effort is one of the most important
things we can do for the conservation of Texas’ bays and estuaries,” said
Will Ohmstede, Chairman of CCA Texas. “This monetary commitment by CCA Texas
will remove active shrimping licenses from Texas bays and help conserve our
fragile bays and estuaries.”
Since its inception
in 1995, the Texas shrimp license buyback program has been a success, aiding
in decreasing inshore shrimping effort by as much as 48 percent with a
decrease in bycatch estimated to be as much as 40 percent. It is widely
held that to produce one pound of marketable shrimp a shrimp trawl will
create as much as five pounds of bycatch while also often causing
significant degradation to coastal bay habitat.
“It is important to
remember that shrimp trawl bycatch is made up of everything from vital
forage fish to juvenile game species,” said Luke Giles, CCA Texas Assistant
Director. “It is estimated that as much as 80 million pounds of bycatch are
removed from Texas bays each year by shrimping efforts. That is a
significant negative impact on the resource.”
The Texas buyback
program offers the opportunity for participants in the shrimping industry to
sell their bay and bait licenses. To date, a significant portion of the
licenses have been removed, but hundreds still remain active. CCA Texas’
recent donation is a vital step in the continued success of the program.
“CCA’s assistance
will dramatically accelerate the timetable to reduce the inshore shrimp
fleet that in turn will minimize bycatch and trawling impacts that are
detrimental to recreational fisheries,” said Dr. Larry McKinney, TPWD
Director of Coastal Fisheries. “ Additionally, this ongoing partnership
between TPWD and CCA demonstrates to the legislature and others that this
effort is a high priority for both of us, and one worthy of their support.”
|
|
Political Animals
Conservation movement flexes its
political muscles
by Jeff Angers
Jeff Angers is president of the
Center for Coastal Conservation. He recently passed on the torch
of CCA Louisiana Executive Director, a position he held for the
past 15 years. Prior to his leadership role in CCA, he worked as a
political consultant and campaign manager for state legislative
and congressional candidates in multiple states.
|

Fish are the most political animals of
all. And to be successful stewards of our nation’s marine resources,
conservationists must be actively involved in politics.
Many of us have been involved advocacy
politics on behalf of conservation. We have had great success passing
laws in state capitols; championing responsible regulations at state
agencies, and winning battles in state courtrooms which better steward
our particular fisheries.
But the battleground for many fishery
issues is shifting to Washington, D.C. where elective politics
are far more important to advocacy efforts.
|
Center Adds New Dimension
to Marine Conservation
The Center for Coastal Conservation represents a great
opportunity for conservationists across the country to affect
the political process – which affects anglers.
For 30 years now, CCA has
recruited a broad-based membership; raised the necessary funds
to advance our conservation agenda; advocated good conservation
in capital cities across the country, and communicated its
mission. We’ve been pretty successful: Net bans in a number of
states. Game fish status protection for various species. We’ve
actually been very successful.
The Center adds a political
dimension allowing conservationists to be involved in the
campaigns of those interested in marine conservation.
Jack
Lawton, Jr. long ago founded one of CCA’s most successful and
influential state chapters, CCA Louisiana. He has again stepped
up to help found and chair the Center for Coastal Conservation,
and I am proud to join with him in this effort.
-
Walter W. Fondren III
|
A few fellow anglers who understand
these realities recently formed the Center for Coastal Conservation.
We call it, simply, the “Center.”
The Center is the political arm of
America’s marine conservation movement. It was formed to affect public
policy related to the conservation of marine resources with broad
abilities to pursue political solutions. Because it is political in
nature, it is organized under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code, a section which precludes deductibility of donations.
Additionally, the Center has created a
federal political action committee (Center PAC) so that its members
can fully participate in elective politics.
Many of the same faces who started state
chapters of the Coastal Conservation Association in their respective
states have stepped forward again in founding the Center. The same
conservation ethic and dedication to success will dominate its work.
The Center focuses on educating members
of Congress regarding marine conservation issues. And through its PAC,
the Center is growing champions in the U.S. Senate and House of
Representatives for the cause of good stewardship of America’s marine
fishery resources.
The Center’s objectives are to:
·
Impact decision makers with regard to marine-resource policy
initiatives;
·
Communicate information to educate decision makers, marine
conservation organizations, corporations and the general public, and
·
Affect the political process.
The Center is a membership
organization overseen by a board of directors. Membership is based on
contributions to the Center and a commitment to participate in
federal political activities necessary to support conservation.
Counting 100,000 active members and
volunteers, CCA is the most effective grassroots marine conservation
organization in the country. The Center is not reinventing the wheel.
Instead, the Center is focused on recruiting 100 members interested in
supporting our efforts to affect the political process. We’re already
half way there. Annual membership dues are $5,000.
If you are interested in participating
in the Center, please contact me at
jeff@CoastalConservation.US
or (225) 931-9700. Remember: people are political animals too.
|

Coastal
Conservation Association
6919 Portwest, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77024
www.JoinCCA.org
|