Common Question Regarding CCA’s Position on MPAs
Does CCA oppose marine protected areas?
No. CCA opposes the arbitrary exclusion of recreational anglers
from our nation’s renewable fishery resources. CCA opposes regulations
that prohibit recreational fishing access unless it can be
scientifically determined that recreational fishermen are the cause of
a specific conservation problem and traditional conservation measures
are inadequate to solve the problem.
Has CCA ever supported area closures?
CCA has supported the use of area and time closures. We have
supported area and time closures (combined with controls on displaced
effort) to reduce highly migratory species bycatch. CCA equally
supported an area closure intended to prevent fishermen from targeting
a gag grouper spawning aggregation area (that later turned into an
arbitrary blanket closure to all recreational fishing and prompted a
lawsuit by CCA).
Doesn’t the NASA/Cape Canaveral no-fishing zone show the value
of these types of closures?
No. The blanket access closure in the area surrounding Cape
Canaveral was implemented for NASA security. There is some thought
that the exceptional recreational fishing in adjacent areas to the
closure is directly attributable to this no-fishing zone. But with a
state gill net ban and increased state regulatory measures to conserve
coastal resources (which were both spearheaded by the interests and
efforts of recreational fishermen), it is impossible to link the
security closure to improved fishing.
What is the Freedom To Fish Act?
CCA and the American Sportfishing Association worked with
congressional leaders to draft The Freedom To Fish Act (S 1314). It
was introduced late in the 106th congressional session (sponsored by
Sen. John Breaux, D-LA and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-TX) where it
was referred to committee. This critically important bill has been
reintroduced in the 107th Congress (by Sen. Breaux and Sen. Hutchison)
to help ensure recreational anglers’ freedom to fish. It includes a
specific set of criteria for the proper utilization of marine
protected areas while acknowledging recreational anglers’ freedom to
access our nation’s renewable marine fisheries.
Do recreational fishermen have a “right” to fish?
No. Although some states have right-to-fish legislation either
pending or implemented, there is no congressional right-to-fish
legislation. As it stands, CCA is calling for recreational anglers’
freedom to fish, free of arbitrary government exclusion from otherwise
open areas of the U.S. seas.
***END***