FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
April 3, 2004
CONTACT: Ted Venker
1-800-201-3474
Freedom to Fish Act
to Clarify
Role of Marine Protected Areas
Washington, DC –
Legislative efforts to delineate the role of no-fishing
zones in federal fisheries management have taken another step forward
with the introduction of the Freedom to Fish Act (S. 2244) by Sens. Kay
Bailey Hutchison’s (R-TX) and John Breaux (D-LA). This important
legislation seeks to establish basic criteria for the use of marine
protected areas (MPAs) and provides for the continued use of the
nation's fishery resources by recreational anglers without arbitrary
closures of public waters.
“By using measurable scientific criteria, the
Freedom to Fish Act will correct a system that could unfairly penalize
America's recreational fishermen and provides more effective protection
of our resources,” Sen. Hutchison said. “This bill brings some common
sense to managing our coastal and ocean waters."
The use of MPAs has sparked intense debate
among different user groups since 2000, when closures to recreational
fishing were arbitrarily implemented off the west coast of Florida and
in the Channel Islands of California. In response to those closures,
Coastal Conservation Association (CCA) and the American Sportfishing
Association (ASA) worked with congressional leaders to draft the Freedom
to Fish Act, which will ensure that MPAs are only considered within the
framework of traditional fisheries management. The legislation has found
broad support among recreational angling groups, including the
Recreational Fishing Alliance, BASS, National Marine Manufacturers
Association, International Game Fish Association and Jersey Coast
Anglers Association.
“This legislation does not prohibit the use
of marine protected areas, but rather lays the ground rules for their
use without arbitrarily and unnecessarily excluding the public,” said
Frederic L. Miller, chairman of CCA’s Government Relations Committee.
“MPAs are a management tool in the box available to fishery managers.
They are not a tool to circumvent the entire fishery management
process.”
“Over the last several
years, many different groups, including the sportfishing community, have
been pushing for stronger ocean conservation policies,” said ASA
President and CEO Mike Nussman. “But better conservation does not need
to come at the expense of sportfishing. The sportfishing community will
be an important ally in broader efforts to make progress for our
oceans.”
CCA opposes regulations that prohibit
recreational fishing unless it can be scientifically determined that
recreational fishermen are the cause of a specific conservation problem
and traditional conservation measures are inadequate to solve the
problem.
“Recreational anglers have a long history
of putting the health of a fishery ahead of their own interests within
the fisheries management system,” said David Cummins, CCA president.
“Ocean sanctuaries, marine reserves and MPAs all have a place within the
realm of fisheries management. The tenets of the Freedom to Fish bill
have a place there, too.”
For a complete copy of the Senate Freedom
to Fish bill, S. 2244, as well as the House version introduced by
Congressman Jim Saxton (NJ-3rd), H.R. 2890, go to
www.joincca.org.
Copy of
S. 2244 (pdf format)